Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Notice is Notice, or, When Probate Attorneys Attack

Sometimes, in a the middle of an otherwise mundane appellate court opinion, you get a snippet if the flavor of the underlying litigation. In Estate of Kelly, there was just such a whif.

The rule of law should keep most probate attorneys on their toes. Stanley Kelly died leaving an estate of over $1 million. His father, E. George Kelly, petitioned the court for letters of administration (which is what you do so you can probate the estate). George also notified Human Rights Campaign, Inc. (HRC) that it was the beneficiary of several of Sanley's bank accounts. George filed a petition stating that Stanley died without a will or trust (i.e., he died intestate), and asking the court to approve distributing Stanley's estate to himself as the sole heir. HRC responded with a petition to probate a handwritten (or "holographic") will by Stanely leaving his entire estate to them. George claimed that the time period for HRC to admit the holographic will had expired, and so they could not receive Stanley's estate under the will. The court held that the clock never started ticking on the time period for admitting the holographic will because George never gave HRC notice of the petition for letters of administration. George argued that he did six different things that communicated to HRC that he was probating Stanley's estate, all of which effectively notified HRC that he was the administrator. The court was having none of it, and held that Notice means Notice. The only thing that starts the clock ticking for someone to admit a will to probate is Notice using the proper Judicial Council form. Sorry, George, but HRC gets to admit to probate Stanley's holographic will giving his $1 million estate to them.

Now for the interesting part. The factual statement in the opinion contained this passage: "The bigger picture was that the Administrator and his counsel had superfiduciary duties 'not to mislead the court, and they have duties to make sure that the estate is probated and tha tit follows the wishes and intent of the decedent.' The court rejected the argument that counsel for the administrator was placed in an adversarial position; his duty was to probate the estate, not to obtain a distribution for [George] Kelly." In other words, counsel, remember who your client is! The attorney George hired represented the Estate of Stanley Kelly, not George as sole heir. Somehwere along the way, this attorney lost sight of this, and fought for George over the estate. I can't help but think that court was, in part, bringing counsel back in line by using the "strict construction" of the notice requirements of Probate Code section 8226.

Although I love the phrase "superfiduciary duties," I must admit I fear that it is going to start showing up fairly regularly in pleadings.

5 comments:

Shelly Smith said...

Well said..!!
Shelly Smith..
-----------------------
attorneys

Unknown said...

Hey! Keep it up! This is a good read. I will be looking forward to visit your page again and for your other posts as well. Thank you for sharing your thoughts about attorney in your area. I am glad to stop by your site and know more about attorney.
In India, the term "lawyer" is often colloquially used, but the official term is "advocate" as prescribed under the Advocates Act, 1961.
Our ability to represent you to the fullest is backed by our long history of legal victories and settlements in our clients favor. Feel comfortable with the attorneys at the Danvers Law Offices, who will demand justice on your behalf.

Attorney Middleton MA

Unknown said...

Great post! Thanks for sharing this. What are your thoughts about a Probate Lawyer in Phoenix?

costlules said...

In other phrases, counsel, bear in mind who your consumer is!





http://www.sarasotalaw.biz/

Jakuba Lucas said...

I' m Jakuba Lucas by name and I live in the Makati Philippines, Am so much filled with happiness and Joy,I would like to talk about the goodness of God in my life, after so many months of trying to get a loan on the internet, so I became desperate in getting a loan from a legit lender online then I see comment from a friend called bobby Leo and talked about this legit loan officer , where he got his loan quick and easy with no stress, so he introduced me to a man named Mr.Pedro who work as a loan officer, so I asked for a loan sum ($ 89,000.00 USD) with a low interest rate of 2%, so the loan was approved and was deposited into my bank account that was how I was able to get a loan to start up my business running and pay off my bills, so I advise each of you who are interested in getting a loan quick and easy or sblc, please contact them via Email: pedroloanss@gmail.com get any kind of loan you need today, thank you, as you read the greatest testimony of my life.